feat(bench): add managed nightly RPC benchmarks - #3944
Conversation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #3944 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 74.63% 74.42% -0.21%
==========================================
Files 462 462
Lines 40989 41061 +72
==========================================
- Hits 30592 30561 -31
- Misses 8294 8393 +99
- Partials 2103 2107 +4
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
a70bc65 to
dcb6bf9
Compare
a19dee7 to
17d0c39
Compare
17d0c39 to
72969ea
Compare
72969ea to
a39478c
Compare
a39478c to
49fe138
Compare
49fe138 to
70d5234
Compare
|
Claude finished @danielntmd's task in 8m 14s —— View job Review: managed nightly RPC benchmarks
Solid, careful work — atomic staged generation with The findings below are mostly about operability of the reuse scheme — what happens on the days when inputs change. BlockerNone. Important
Nit
Note: I reviewed by reading — the sandbox here blocked running |
2336b7f to
1a40181
Compare
|
Claude finished @danielntmd's task in 4m 20s —— View job Re-review: managed nightly RPC benchmarks
Still This push is one change, and it's the one I'd have picked: Nothing regressed. The two "important" items below are both things the removed manifest used to cover and the restructure didn't carry forward — same shape as the BlockerNone. Important
Nit
Not worth another inline comment — all previously raised and answered: the catalog-read-⇒- Note: as in all five prior rounds, the sandbox blocked |
infrmtcs
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This version is much better than the previous one. I've reviewed ~80% of this PR and left these comments, I think the remaining can be reviewed after we address these.
1a40181 to
2ea3475
Compare
|
Claude finished @danielntmd's task in 6m 54s —— View job Re-review: managed nightly RPC benchmarks
Still Every item @infrmtcs raised is addressed, and the catalog change in particular does more work than it looks like:
I traced the container paths again — BlockerNone. Important
Nit
Not worth another inline comment, all previously raised and answered: the catalog-read-⇒- Note: as in all six prior rounds, the sandbox blocked |
- Adds a nightly runner for corpus reconciliation and warmup/measured k6 runs. - Publish a dedicated benchmark image. - Nightly.json catalog validation in CI.
2ea3475 to
6fd6d61
Compare
|
Claude finished @danielntmd's task in 3m 49s —— View job Re-review: managed nightly RPC benchmarks
Both items I'd have picked from last round landed:
I re-traced the build while checking that second one: CorrectionMy claim last round that BlockerNone. Important
Nit
Not worth another inline comment, all previously raised and answered: the catalog-read-⇒- Note: as in all seven prior rounds, the sandbox blocked |
|
Claude finished @danielntmd's task in 3m 2s —— View job Re-review: managed nightly RPC benchmarks
That's commit
I traced the mechanics and they're right: BlockerNone. Important
Nit
Not worth another inline comment, all previously raised and answered: the catalog-read-⇒- Note: as in all eight prior rounds, the sandbox blocked |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.